QFLR vs. NAPR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Innovator. QFLR is actively managed, while NAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, QFLR returned 19.39% vs 15.62% for NAPR. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NAPR.

Performance

QFLR vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QFLR achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 9.21% return.

QFLR

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: 3.09%
• 6M: 2.26%
• 1Y: 19.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NAPR

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 9.19%
• 1Y: 15.62%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFLR vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	3.09%	17.27%	16.30%
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	9.21%	6.56%	12.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QFLR and NAPR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.83

The correlation between QFLR and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QFLR vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 53
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 62

NAPR

NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 97
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFLR vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QFLR	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	3.65	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	5.83	-3.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.86	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	8.77	-6.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.06	50.14	-40.09

QFLR vs. NAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the NAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QFLR and NAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QFLR vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, smaller than the maximum NAPR drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and NAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QFLR	NAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.97%	-16.53%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	-1.79%	-5.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.02%	-1.29%	-2.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-2.26%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	0.31%	+1.62%

Volatility

QFLR vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 2.27%. This indicates that QFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QFLR	NAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.55%	2.27%	+4.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	3.55%	+6.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	4.32%	+8.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.12%	11.31%	+1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	10.60%	+2.52%

QFLR vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

QFLR vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither QFLR nor NAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QFLR and NAPR in my portfolio?

QFLR and NAPR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QFLR or NAPR?

QFLR has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to NAPR (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QFLR dropped -13.97% vs NAPR's -16.53%.

Which ETF is better, QFLR or NAPR?

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 19.39% vs 15.62% for NAPR. On fees, NAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, NAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QFLR or NAPR?

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 19.39% return vs 15.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QFLR or NAPR?

NAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QFLR or NAPR?

QFLR and NAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QFLR and NAPR?

Their fees differ too: 0.89% for QFLR and 0.79% for NAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.