QFLR vs. JULQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) and JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator, while JULQ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. QFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JULQ.

Performance

QFLR vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QFLR

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 6.83%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 26.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFLR vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	5.93%
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%

QFLR vs. JULQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QFLR	JULQ
Technology	50.8%	31.7%
Communication Services	18.4%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	10.4%
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	6.2%
Healthcare	3.2%	10.9%
Industrials	2.8%	7.7%
Utilities	1.5%	2.6%
Energy	1.1%	3.2%
Financial Services	0.9%	14.0%
Basic Materials	0.0%	1.8%
Real Estate	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

QFLR vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 74
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFLR vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QFLR	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.97	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QFLR	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	—	—

Drawdowns

QFLR vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and JULQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QFLR	JULQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.97%	0.00%	-13.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	0.00%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	0.00%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QFLR	JULQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.50%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.27%	0.00%	+11.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.61%	0.00%	+12.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.61%	0.00%	+12.61%

QFLR vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

QFLR vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither QFLR nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QFLR or JULQ?

On fees, JULQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QFLR or JULQ?

JULQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QFLR or JULQ?

QFLR and JULQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QFLR and JULQ?

QFLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while JULQ is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for QFLR and 0.79% for JULQ.