PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFHD vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFHD vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QFHD

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.83%
6M
8.33%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

SRVR

1D
-1.06%
1M
-0.84%
6M
1.06%
YTD
8.80%
1Y
0.43%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
-3.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.06K$29.95K$25.81K
$1.88M$2.23M$2.66M

QFHD vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QFHD and SRVR is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFHD vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QFHD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QFHD vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QFHDSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.05

QFHD vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QFHD vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFHDSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-40.99%

+35.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-20.33%

+18.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-15.30%

+13.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.18%

Volatility

QFHD vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFHDSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

17.42%

-6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.91%

19.89%

-8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.91%

21.39%

-10.48%

QFHD vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QFHD and SRVR have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

QFHD vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than SRVR's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QFHD
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF
1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
2.81%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


QFHD and SRVR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QFHD and SRVR have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.29% for QFHD.

QFHD is categorized as Quality Factor, while SRVR is REIT. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFHD and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer