QFHD vs. SRVR
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
QFHD vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- 14.55%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.36%
- 5Y*
- -2.03%
- 10Y*
- —
QFHD vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 7.93% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 9.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and SRVR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SRVR
QFHD vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFHD | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -40.99% | +35.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -16.12% | +15.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -15.24% | +13.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.97% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 17.30% | -6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.45% | 19.80% | -9.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.45% | 21.44% | -10.99% |
QFHD vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than SRVR's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.67% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and SRVR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.33% for QFHD.
QFHD is categorized as Dividend, while SRVR is REIT. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.60% for SRVR.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer