QFHD vs. KBWY
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and KBWY (Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while KBWY is a REIT fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Premium Yield Equity REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWY.
Performance
QFHD vs. KBWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
KBWY
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- 6M
- 20.28%
- YTD
- 25.42%
- 1Y
- 32.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.57M | $2.83M | $2.51M | |
| $8.06K | $29.95K | $25.81K |
QFHD vs. KBWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 11.66% |
KBWY Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF | 19.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and KBWY is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. KBWY — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KBWY
QFHD vs. KBWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF (KBWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFHD | KBWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. KBWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum KBWY drawdown of -57.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and KBWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | KBWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -57.68% | +52.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -4.45% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -14.08% | +12.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.70% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. KBWY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | KBWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.91% | 16.51% | -5.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.91% | 21.56% | -10.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.91% | 27.06% | -16.15% |
QFHD vs. KBWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. KBWY - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than KBWY's 8.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWY Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF | 8.11% | 9.79% | 8.74% | 7.90% | 7.41% | 5.05% | 10.35% | 6.19% | 8.64% | 7.25% | 6.55% | 5.72% |
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and KBWY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KBWY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KBWY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.
KBWY has the higher dividend yield at 8.11%, compared with 1.29% for QFHD.
QFHD is categorized as Quality Factor, while KBWY is REIT. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while KBWY tracks KBW Nasdaq Premium Yield Equity REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.35% for KBWY.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and KBWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer