PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFHD vs. DJD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFHD vs. DJD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QFHD

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.83%
6M
8.33%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

DJD

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.05%
6M
9.67%
YTD
14.63%
1Y
25.62%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
12.39%
ALL TIME*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.54M$2.87M$2.55M
$8.06K$29.95K$25.81K

QFHD vs. DJD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QFHD and DJD is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFHD vs. DJD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QFHD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DJD
DJD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DJD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DJD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJD Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QFHD vs. DJD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QFHDDJDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.25

QFHD vs. DJD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QFHD vs. DJD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum DJD drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and DJD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFHDDJDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-34.66%

+29.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-1.36%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-3.70%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

Volatility

QFHD vs. DJD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFHDDJDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

10.58%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.91%

13.38%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.91%

16.59%

-5.68%

QFHD vs. DJD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DJD's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFHD vs. DJD - Dividend Comparison

QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than DJD's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJD
Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF
2.42%2.62%3.00%3.49%3.16%2.82%3.47%2.80%2.66%2.75%2.46%0.08%
QFHD
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF
1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QFHD and DJD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DJD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DJD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.

DJD has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.29% for QFHD.

QFHD is categorized as Quality Factor, while DJD is Large Cap Value Equities. QFHD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while DJD tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Yield Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.07% for DJD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFHD and DJD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer