QEW vs. QRMI
QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) and QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QEW is passively managed, while QRMI is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QEW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QRMI.
Performance
QEW vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QEW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QRMI
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 9.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QEW vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 21.49% |
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between QEW and QRMI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QEW vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank
QEW
QRMI
QEW vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QEW | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 9.75 | 0.22 | +9.53 |
Drawdowns
QEW vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum QRMI drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and QRMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QEW | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -20.95% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | 0.00% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -7.98% | +7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.14% | — |
Volatility
QEW vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QEW | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 5.76% | +10.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 8.34% | +7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 8.34% | +7.44% |
QEW vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QEW vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison
QEW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.19% | 12.28% | 11.80% | 12.44% | 10.65% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QEW and QRMI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.
QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.19%, compared with 0.00% for QEW.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QEW and 0.60% for QRMI.
Find the right allocation for QEW and QRMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer