QEMM vs. ROAM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QEMM (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF) and ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - QEMM tracks the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD) while ROAM tracks the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QEMM returned 8.96%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for ROAM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QEMM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ROAM.

Performance

QEMM vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEMM achieves a 24.39% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 26.83% return. Over the past 10 years, QEMM has underperformed ROAM with an annualized return of 8.96%, while ROAM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.

QEMM

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 24.39%
• 6M: 26.00%
• 1Y: 42.27%
• 3Y*: 19.52%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

ROAM

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 8.68%
• YTD: 26.83%
• 6M: 28.99%
• 1Y: 51.96%
• 3Y*: 26.00%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEMM vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	24.39%	21.92%	4.98%	12.50%	-17.82%	6.34%	9.95%	15.40%	-13.33%	31.50%
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	26.83%	32.08%	6.21%	21.28%	-14.78%	9.32%	2.24%	8.89%	-12.24%	27.69%

Correlation

The correlation between QEMM and ROAM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015	0.83

The correlation between QEMM and ROAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QEMM vs. ROAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QEMM	ROAM
Technology	33.8%	39.4%
Financial Services	19.6%	19.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	7.6%
Industrials	7.2%	5.6%
Communication Services	6.4%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	4.8%
Energy	5.7%	5.3%
Basic Materials	5.6%	4.1%
Healthcare	3.5%	3.3%
Utilities	3.0%	2.3%
Real Estate	0.8%	1.3%

Return for Risk

QEMM vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEMM

QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 78
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

ROAM

ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 91
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEMM vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QEMM	ROAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	3.50	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	4.48	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.63	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	5.27	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.92	19.91	-4.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QEMM vs. ROAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEMM Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the ROAM Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEMM and ROAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QEMM	ROAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	3.50	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.81	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.55	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.38	-0.04

Drawdowns

QEMM vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEMM drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, smaller than the maximum ROAM drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEMM and ROAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QEMM	ROAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.89%	-45.47%	+8.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-9.92%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.03%	-16.79%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.49%	-27.07%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.89%	-45.47%	+8.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-1.60%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	-11.13%	+0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	2.62%	+0.22%

Volatility

QEMM vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) at 6.41%. This indicates that QEMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QEMM	ROAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	6.41%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.78%	12.76%	+2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.69%	14.93%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.23%	15.23%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.89%	17.87%	-0.98%

QEMM vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEMM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

QEMM vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison

QEMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than ROAM's 2.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	4.34%	4.90%	5.17%	4.88%	4.07%	2.35%	2.48%	3.05%	2.86%	2.11%	2.03%	2.14%
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	2.50%	3.17%	4.15%	5.40%	5.23%	4.22%	3.04%	3.55%	2.54%	1.84%	1.89%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QEMM and ROAM in my portfolio?

QEMM and ROAM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QEMM or ROAM?

QEMM has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to ROAM (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEMM dropped -36.89% vs ROAM's -45.47%.

Which ETF is better, QEMM or ROAM?

On 10-year performance, ROAM leads with 9.87% vs 8.96% for QEMM. On fees, QEMM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ROAM has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QEMM or ROAM?

Over the 10-year period, ROAM has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QEMM or ROAM?

QEMM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for ROAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QEMM or ROAM?

QEMM has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 2.50% for ROAM.

What is the main difference between QEMM and ROAM?

QEMM tracks MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEMM and 0.44% for ROAM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.