PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QEFA vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QEFA vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEFA achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 23.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QEFA having a 9.05% annualized return and XLE not far ahead at 9.37%.


QEFA

1D
-0.89%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
6.21%
6M
5.79%
1Y
17.01%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
9.05%

XLE

1D
0.74%
1M
-7.80%
YTD
23.49%
6M
24.07%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEFA vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QEFA
SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
6.21%29.25%2.27%17.40%-14.03%12.50%6.76%21.91%-10.39%24.03%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
23.49%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QEFA and XLE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2014

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between QEFA and XLE has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QEFA vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QEFA
XLE

Financial Services

14.3%

-

Healthcare

11.4%

-

Technology

10.5%

-

Industrials

9.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

4.9%

-

Energy

4.3%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%

-

Communication Services

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Financial Services

QEFA
14.3%
XLE

-

Healthcare

QEFA
11.4%
XLE

-

Technology

QEFA
10.5%
XLE

-

Industrials

QEFA
9.1%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

QEFA
6.2%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

QEFA
4.9%
XLE

-

Energy

QEFA
4.3%
XLE
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

QEFA
4.2%
XLE

-

Communication Services

QEFA
3.2%
XLE

-

Utilities

QEFA
2.3%
XLE

-

Real Estate

QEFA
1.7%
XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QEFA vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEFA
QEFA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
QEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
QEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEFA vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QEFAXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.18

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.30

6.53

-0.23

QEFA vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEFA and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QEFA vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.71%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEFA and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QEFAXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.71%

-71.26%

+39.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-14.05%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-20.14%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-26.04%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.71%

-66.81%

+35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-12.32%

+8.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-17.96%

+11.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

4.69%

-1.98%

Volatility

QEFA vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) is 3.70%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that QEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QEFAXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

7.12%

-3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

16.82%

-6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

20.93%

-7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

25.98%

-11.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

29.60%

-13.73%

QEFA vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEFA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QEFA vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

QEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than XLE's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QEFA
SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
2.89%3.13%3.17%2.79%3.02%2.37%1.82%2.95%3.22%2.33%2.01%2.94%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.79%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


QEFA and XLE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to QEFA (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEFA dropped -31.71% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.37% vs 9.05% for QEFA. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, QEFA has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for QEFA.

QEFA has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 2.79% for XLE.

QEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. QEFA tracks MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEFA and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QEFA and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer