PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVE.DE vs. RR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVE.DE vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QDVE.DE is traded in EUR, while RR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RR.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVE.DE achieves a 18.83% return, which is significantly higher than RR.L's 15.47% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVE.DE has outperformed RR.L with an annualized return of 25.61%, while RR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 19.97% annualized return.


QDVE.DE

1D
2.52%
1M
0.56%
YTD
18.83%
6M
20.81%
1Y
43.45%
3Y*
28.42%
5Y*
23.77%
10Y*
25.61%

RR.L

1D
4.32%
1M
15.98%
YTD
15.47%
6M
21.86%
1Y
49.56%
3Y*
106.06%
5Y*
63.84%
10Y*
19.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVE.DE vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
18.83%10.01%46.09%54.17%-25.82%46.74%29.67%53.89%3.09%20.90%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
15.47%94.10%98.88%228.38%-28.06%17.64%-55.13%-11.21%-1.85%22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVE.DE and RR.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2015

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVE.DE vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

RR.L
RR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVE.DE vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDVE.DERR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.47

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

6.73

+0.30

QDVE.DE vs. RR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the RR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVE.DE and RR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDVE.DE vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVE.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum RR.L drawdown of -91.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVE.DE and RR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVE.DERR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-91.10%

+59.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.60%

-18.74%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-23.57%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-56.76%

+26.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

-89.60%

+58.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.15%

-2.90%

-4.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-31.91%

+26.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

6.89%

-0.86%

Volatility

QDVE.DE vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) is 8.02%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a volatility of 11.90%. This indicates that QDVE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVE.DERR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

11.90%

-3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.46%

31.49%

-16.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.88%

36.77%

-15.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.78%

42.68%

-19.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

49.47%

-27.72%

Dividends

QDVE.DE vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison

QDVE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
0.73%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%1.41%0.54%1.75%4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVE.DE and RR.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVE.DE and RR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer