PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTE vs. NFLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QDTE vs. NFLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QDTE vs. NFLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a -5.34% return, which is significantly lower than NFLP's 0.30% return.


QDTE

1D
2.12%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
-5.34%
6M
-1.02%
1Y
20.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLP

1D
3.42%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
0.30%
6M
-20.64%
1Y
-5.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QDTE vs. NFLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QDTE vs. NFLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLP
NFLP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NFLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. NFLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDTENFLPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

-0.16

+1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

-0.00

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.00

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

-0.12

+1.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.36

-0.26

+5.62

QDTE vs. NFLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the NFLP Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and NFLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDTENFLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

-0.16

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.91

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and NFLP is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QDTE vs. NFLP - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.06%, more than NFLP's 22.51% yield.


Drawdowns

QDTE vs. NFLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum NFLP drawdown of -43.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and NFLP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTENFLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.86%

-43.48%

+20.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-43.48%

+29.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.29%

-28.42%

+20.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-8.08%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

20.29%

-16.64%

Volatility

QDTE vs. NFLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 5.64%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QDTENFLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

7.80%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

26.24%

-14.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

32.50%

-13.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.70%

28.07%

-9.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

28.07%

-9.37%