QDTE vs. CRF

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) are both funds - QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CRF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Cornerstone. Over the past year, QDTE returned 35.38% vs 12.90% for CRF. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.84%/yr for CRF.

Performance

QDTE vs. CRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 12.97% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -3.31% return.

QDTE

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 12.97%
• 6M: 13.97%
• 1Y: 35.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRF

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: -3.31%
• 6M: -1.76%
• 1Y: 12.90%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTE vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	12.97%	19.32%	17.13%
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	-3.31%	12.46%	35.80%

Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and CRF is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.56

The correlation between QDTE and CRF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QDTE vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 75
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 78

CRF

CRF Risk / Return Rank: 13
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDTE	CRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	0.75	+1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	1.14	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.15	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	0.78	+2.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.94	2.59	+10.35

QDTE vs. CRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and CRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and CRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDTE	CRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.86%	-80.70%	+57.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.20%	-14.88%	+4.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.24%	-5.09%	+1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.15%	-22.31%	+19.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	4.48%	-1.86%

Volatility

QDTE vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) at 4.16%. This indicates that QDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDTE	CRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.09%	4.16%	+2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.66%	13.41%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.99%	15.41%	+0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.77%	25.07%	-6.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.77%	25.86%	-7.09%

QDTE vs. CRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than CRF's 1.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDTE vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.17%, more than CRF's 19.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	19.63%	17.38%	14.32%	19.94%	29.31%	13.41%	18.91%	21.67%	24.85%	17.96%	24.08%	23.58%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.17%	49.49%	32.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDTE and CRF in my portfolio?

QDTE and CRF have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDTE or CRF?

QDTE has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to CRF (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs CRF's -80.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.