PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTE vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDTE vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.


QDTE

1D
-0.16%
1M
8.99%
YTD
16.58%
6M
16.20%
1Y
40.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.10%
6M
4.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTE vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and BUFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDTE vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDTEBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.08

QDTE vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDTEBUFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

2.68

-1.38

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTEBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.86%

-2.87%

-19.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.07%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-0.24%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

Volatility

QDTE vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDTEBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

3.98%

+10.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

3.98%

+14.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

3.98%

+14.45%

QDTE vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDTE vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.16%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


QDTE and BUFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BUFX is cheaper at 0.96% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BUFX is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 42.16%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

QDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for QDTE and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDTE and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer