QDPL vs. PTLC
QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) and PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Pacer - QDPL tracks the Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400 while PTLC tracks the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDPL returned 19.16%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for PTLC. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
QDPL vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDPL achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than PTLC's 2.97% return.
QDPL
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 7.14%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTLC
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 17.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
QDPL vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 7.95% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 7.82% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 2.97% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | -8.62% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDPL and PTLC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between QDPL and PTLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDPL vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank
QDPL
PTLC
QDPL vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDPL | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.26 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.00 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.85 | 7.66 | +4.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDPL vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and PTLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDPL | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -26.63% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -8.77% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | -15.17% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -3.15% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | -5.63% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.28% | -0.37% |
Volatility
QDPL vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) have volatilities of 4.91% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDPL | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 4.91% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 9.19% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 11.98% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 11.87% | +3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 13.19% | +1.88% |
QDPL vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QDPL and PTLC have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
QDPL vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison
QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than PTLC's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 5.16% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QDPL and PTLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PTLC has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to QDPL (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs PTLC's -26.63%.
On 3-year performance, QDPL leads with 19.16% vs 13.44% for PTLC. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 19.16% return vs 13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDPL and PTLC have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 1.03% for PTLC.
QDPL tracks Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400, while PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index.
QDPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDPL and PTLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer