QDPL vs. GPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDPL returned 26.37% vs 25.55% for GPIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDPL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.

Performance

QDPL vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QDPL having a 10.40% return and GPIX slightly lower at 9.91%.

QDPL

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 26.37%
• 3Y*: 20.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: 25.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDPL vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	10.40%	16.52%	22.83%	14.26%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	9.91%	16.25%	21.77%	13.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and GPIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.92

The correlation between QDPL and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDPL vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDPL	GPIX
Technology	27.6%	35.5%
Financial Services	10.3%	11.6%
Communication Services	8.5%	11.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	10.1%
Healthcare	7.6%	8.4%
Industrials	6.3%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	4.9%
Energy	2.4%	3.5%
Utilities	2.1%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.5%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.8%

Return for Risk

QDPL vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 67
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 75

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDPL vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDPL	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.52	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	3.48	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.48	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	3.33	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.37	16.77	-2.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QDPL vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDPL	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	2.52	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.78	-0.95

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDPL	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-17.50%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-7.71%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-0.48%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.14%	-1.48%	-3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	1.53%	+0.31%

Volatility

QDPL vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 2.26%. This indicates that QDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDPL	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	2.26%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	7.89%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.89%	10.17%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.01%	13.80%	+1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.01%	13.80%	+1.21%

QDPL vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDPL vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than GPIX's 8.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	8.00%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	5.05%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDPL and GPIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, QDPL and GPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QDPL or GPIX?

QDPL has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to GPIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

Which ETF is better, QDPL or GPIX?

On 1-year performance, QDPL leads with 26.37% vs 25.55% for GPIX. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDPL or GPIX?

Over the 1-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 26.37% return vs 25.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDPL or GPIX?

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDPL or GPIX?

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 5.05% for QDPL.

What is the main difference between QDPL and GPIX?

QDPL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QDPL and 0.29% for GPIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.