PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDPL vs. FTQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDPL vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDPL having a 10.40% return and FTQI slightly higher at 10.78%.


QDPL

1D
-0.65%
1M
5.23%
YTD
10.40%
6M
10.54%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
10Y*

FTQI

1D
0.09%
1M
4.10%
YTD
10.78%
6M
11.65%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDPL vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
10.40%16.52%22.83%23.66%-16.25%8.32%
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
10.78%12.68%18.30%23.63%-8.77%3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and FTQI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021

0.83

The correlation between QDPL and FTQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDPL vs. FTQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDPL
FTQI

Technology

27.6%
35.5%

Financial Services

10.3%
13.3%

Communication Services

8.5%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
8.4%

Healthcare

7.6%
8.4%

Industrials

6.3%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
5.9%

Energy

2.4%
7.4%

Utilities

2.1%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.4%
3.9%

Technology

QDPL
27.6%
FTQI
35.5%

Financial Services

QDPL
10.3%
FTQI
13.3%

Communication Services

QDPL
8.5%
FTQI
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QDPL
8.4%
FTQI
8.4%

Healthcare

QDPL
7.6%
FTQI
8.4%

Industrials

QDPL
6.3%
FTQI
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

QDPL
4.0%
FTQI
5.9%

Energy

QDPL
2.4%
FTQI
7.4%

Utilities

QDPL
2.1%
FTQI
3.9%

Real Estate

QDPL
1.5%
FTQI
2.0%

Basic Materials

QDPL
1.4%
FTQI
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDPL vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDPL
QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDPL vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDPLFTQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.52

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

4.54

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.37

22.02

-7.64

QDPL vs. FTQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FTQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and FTQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDPLFTQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.74

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.52

+0.31

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and FTQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDPLFTQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-19.42%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-6.24%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-19.42%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

0.00%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-3.76%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.28%

+0.56%

Volatility

QDPL vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) at 1.66%. This indicates that QDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDPLFTQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

1.66%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

8.24%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.89%

10.33%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

14.81%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.01%

13.36%

+1.65%

QDPL vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDPL vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than FTQI's 10.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
10.96%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
5.05%4.84%5.43%6.30%7.27%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDPL and FTQI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDPL has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to FTQI (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs FTQI's -19.42%.

On 3-year performance, QDPL leads with 20.64% vs 17.12% for FTQI. On fees, QDPL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 17.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDPL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.96%, compared with 5.05% for QDPL.

QDPL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QDPL and 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDPL and FTQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer