QDPL vs. FTQI
QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. QDPL is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDPL returned 20.64%/yr vs 17.12%/yr for FTQI. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDPL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
QDPL vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDPL having a 10.40% return and FTQI slightly higher at 10.78%.
QDPL
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTQI
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 6M
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
QDPL vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 10.40% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 8.32% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.78% | 12.68% | 18.30% | 23.63% | -8.77% | 3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDPL and FTQI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between QDPL and FTQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDPL vs. FTQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDPL
FTQI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QDPL
FTQI
Financial Services
QDPL
FTQI
Communication Services
QDPL
FTQI
Consumer Cyclical
QDPL
FTQI
Healthcare
QDPL
FTQI
Industrials
QDPL
FTQI
Consumer Defensive
QDPL
FTQI
Energy
QDPL
FTQI
Utilities
QDPL
FTQI
Real Estate
QDPL
FTQI
Basic Materials
QDPL
FTQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDPL vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
QDPL
FTQI
QDPL vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDPL | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.52 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 4.54 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.37 | 22.02 | -7.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDPL | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.74 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.52 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
QDPL vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDPL | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -19.42% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -6.24% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | -19.42% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | 0.00% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -3.76% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 1.28% | +0.56% |
Volatility
QDPL vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) at 1.66%. This indicates that QDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDPL | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 1.66% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 8.24% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 10.33% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 14.81% | +0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 13.36% | +1.65% |
QDPL vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDPL vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than FTQI's 10.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.96% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 5.05% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDPL and FTQI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDPL has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to FTQI (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs FTQI's -19.42%.
On 3-year performance, QDPL leads with 20.64% vs 17.12% for FTQI. On fees, QDPL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 17.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDPL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.
FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.96%, compared with 5.05% for QDPL.
QDPL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QDPL and 0.75% for FTQI.
FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDPL and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer