PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDIV vs. QDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDIV vs. QDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than QDEF's 8.81% return.


QDIV

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.84%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.70%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*

QDEF

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.94%
YTD
8.81%
6M
8.87%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDIV vs. QDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
8.21%3.16%10.62%5.18%-0.50%28.99%0.03%29.00%-12.20%
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
8.81%17.43%21.19%17.48%-10.94%26.04%3.15%24.90%-8.13%

Correlation

The correlation between QDIV and QDEF is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.79

The correlation between QDIV and QDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QDIV vs. QDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDIV
QDEF

Consumer Defensive

21.9%
7.4%

Industrials

16.5%
6.7%

Healthcare

14.3%
11.4%

Energy

14.1%
4.0%

Basic Materials

8.4%
3.0%

Technology

8.1%
32.8%

Financial Services

6.9%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
7.3%

Communication Services

3.7%
7.7%

Real Estate

-

5.4%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Consumer Defensive

QDIV
21.9%
QDEF
7.4%

Industrials

QDIV
16.5%
QDEF
6.7%

Healthcare

QDIV
14.3%
QDEF
11.4%

Energy

QDIV
14.1%
QDEF
4.0%

Basic Materials

QDIV
8.4%
QDEF
3.0%

Technology

QDIV
8.1%
QDEF
32.8%

Financial Services

QDIV
6.9%
QDEF
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QDIV
6.1%
QDEF
7.3%

Communication Services

QDIV
3.7%
QDEF
7.7%

Real Estate

QDIV

-

QDEF
5.4%

Utilities

QDIV

-

QDEF
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDIV vs. QDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDIV
QDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
QDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

QDEF
QDEF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDIV vs. QDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDIVQDEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

3.37

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

14.62

-10.11

QDIV vs. QDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the QDEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDIV and QDEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDIVQDEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.44

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.92

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.84

-0.41

Drawdowns

QDIV vs. QDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than QDEF's maximum drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and QDEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDIVQDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.20%

-35.74%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-6.95%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-14.43%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-21.37%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.96%

-0.47%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-3.29%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

1.60%

+1.48%

Volatility

QDIV vs. QDEF - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) at 2.31%. This indicates that QDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDIVQDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.31%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

7.16%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

9.62%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

13.78%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.42%

16.17%

+3.25%

QDIV vs. QDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QDEF's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDIV vs. QDEF - Dividend Comparison

QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than QDEF's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
1.59%1.74%1.85%2.21%2.42%1.84%2.50%3.17%7.10%2.70%2.90%3.00%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
3.23%3.13%2.88%3.26%3.02%2.44%3.06%2.84%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDIV and QDEF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDIV has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to QDEF (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs QDEF's -35.74%.

On 5-year performance, QDEF leads with 12.64% vs 6.17% for QDIV. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.

QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.59% for QDEF.

QDIV is categorized as Dividend, while QDEF is Large Cap Value Equities. QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.37% for QDEF.

QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDIV and QDEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer