QDIV vs. QDEF
QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) and QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QDIV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while QDEF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDIV returned 6.17%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for QDEF. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDIV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for QDEF.
Performance
QDIV vs. QDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than QDEF's 8.81% return.
QDIV
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
QDEF
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
QDIV vs. QDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 8.21% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 8.81% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 26.04% | 3.15% | 24.90% | -8.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV and QDEF is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between QDIV and QDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QDIV vs. QDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDIV
QDEF
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
QDIV
QDEF
Industrials
QDIV
QDEF
Healthcare
QDIV
QDEF
Energy
QDIV
QDEF
Basic Materials
QDIV
QDEF
Technology
QDIV
QDEF
Financial Services
QDIV
QDEF
Consumer Cyclical
QDIV
QDEF
Communication Services
QDIV
QDEF
Real Estate
QDIV
-
QDEF
Utilities
QDIV
-
QDEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDIV vs. QDEF — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV
QDEF
QDIV vs. QDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDIV | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.45 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 3.37 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 14.62 | -10.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDIV | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.44 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.92 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.84 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
QDIV vs. QDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than QDEF's maximum drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and QDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -35.74% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -6.95% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -14.43% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -21.37% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.96% | -0.47% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -3.29% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 1.60% | +1.48% |
Volatility
QDIV vs. QDEF - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) at 2.31%. This indicates that QDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 2.31% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.07% | 7.16% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 9.62% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 13.78% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 16.17% | +3.25% |
QDIV vs. QDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QDEF's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDIV vs. QDEF - Dividend Comparison
QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than QDEF's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.59% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 3.23% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDIV and QDEF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDIV has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to QDEF (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs QDEF's -35.74%.
On 5-year performance, QDEF leads with 12.64% vs 6.17% for QDIV. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.
QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.59% for QDEF.
QDIV is categorized as Dividend, while QDEF is Large Cap Value Equities. QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDIV and QDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer