QDIV vs. MRNY
QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) and MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDIV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while MRNY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. QDIV is passively managed, while MRNY is actively managed. Over the past year, QDIV returned 14.92% vs 53.27% for MRNY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDIV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MRNY.
Performance
QDIV vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 55.67% return.
QDIV
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 8.88%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 14.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- —
MRNY
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- 7.98%
- YTD
- 55.67%
- 6M
- 64.78%
- 1Y
- 53.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDIV vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 8.88% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 9.82% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 55.67% | -35.72% | -59.32% | 19.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV and MRNY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDIV vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV
MRNY
QDIV vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDIV | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.70 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.85 | 3.31 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDIV | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.08 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.48 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
QDIV vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and MRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -82.15% | +40.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -31.53% | +23.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -67.23% | +63.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -52.64% | +47.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 16.15% | -13.06% |
Volatility
QDIV vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) is 2.52%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 13.53%. This indicates that QDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 13.53% | -11.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 37.11% | -29.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.83% | 49.38% | -37.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 50.75% | -35.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 50.75% | -31.33% |
QDIV vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MRNY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDIV vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison
QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than MRNY's 100.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 100.06% | 145.98% | 178.49% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 2.98% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDIV and MRNY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRNY has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to QDIV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs MRNY's -82.15%.
On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 53.27% vs 14.92% for QDIV. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 53.27% return vs 14.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRNY.
MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 100.06%, compared with 2.98% for QDIV.
QDIV is categorized as Dividend, while MRNY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.99% for MRNY.
QDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDIV and MRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer