PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDF vs. SCHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDF vs. SCHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDF achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than SCHY's 13.81% return.


QDF

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.30%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.96%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
12.68%

SCHY

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.02%
6M
7.91%
YTD
13.81%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.70M$2.15M$2.21M
$27.81M$25.09M$19.24M

QDF vs. SCHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
12.96%16.58%16.95%19.71%-12.13%13.23%
SCHY
Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF
13.81%33.98%-1.79%14.27%-9.43%3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QDF and SCHY is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2021

0.67

The correlation between QDF and SCHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDF vs. SCHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDF
SCHY

Technology

37.0%
9.0%

Financial Services

14.8%
13.2%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.6%

Industrials

8.7%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
17.6%

Real Estate

5.6%
0.6%

Communication Services

5.4%
11.6%

Utilities

2.2%
5.7%

Basic Materials

1.5%
5.4%

Energy

0.9%
7.2%

Technology

QDF
37.0%
SCHY
9.0%

Financial Services

QDF
14.8%
SCHY
13.2%

Healthcare

QDF
9.1%
SCHY
8.6%

Industrials

QDF
8.7%
SCHY
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QDF
7.1%
SCHY
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

QDF
5.7%
SCHY
17.6%

Real Estate

QDF
5.6%
SCHY
0.6%

Communication Services

QDF
5.4%
SCHY
11.6%

Utilities

QDF
2.2%
SCHY
5.7%

Basic Materials

QDF
1.5%
SCHY
5.4%

Energy

QDF
0.9%
SCHY
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDF vs. SCHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDF
QDF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHY
SCHY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SCHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDF vs. SCHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDFSCHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.15

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

8.98

+3.70

QDF vs. SCHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDF Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the SCHY Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDF and SCHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDF vs. SCHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than SCHY's maximum drawdown of -24.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and SCHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDFSCHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.67%

-24.04%

-12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-9.11%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.01%

-12.16%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.06%

-24.04%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.48%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-4.93%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

3.19%

-1.35%

Volatility

QDF vs. SCHY - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) have volatilities of 2.96% and 3.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDFSCHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

3.10%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

10.07%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

12.03%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

13.27%

+2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

13.18%

+4.19%

QDF vs. SCHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHY's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDF vs. SCHY - Dividend Comparison

QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than SCHY's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
1.48%1.65%1.93%2.19%2.45%1.90%2.38%3.05%4.29%2.70%3.07%3.04%
SCHY
Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF
3.32%3.55%4.64%3.97%3.67%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDF and SCHY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHY has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to QDF (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDF dropped -36.67% vs SCHY's -24.04%.

On 5-year performance, QDF leads with 11.93% vs 9.14% for SCHY. On fees, SCHY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, QDF has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QDF has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDF.

SCHY has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 1.48% for QDF.

QDF is categorized as Quality Factor, while SCHY is Dividend. QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while SCHY tracks Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.08% for SCHY.

SCHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDF and SCHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer