PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDF vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDF vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDF achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.


QDF

1D
-0.56%
1M
4.60%
YTD
10.70%
6M
10.82%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
12.18%

AVLV

1D
0.14%
1M
5.75%
YTD
20.64%
6M
22.01%
1Y
38.77%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDF vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
10.70%16.58%16.95%19.71%-12.13%7.83%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
20.64%15.12%17.49%17.43%-5.53%5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between QDF and AVLV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.91

The correlation between QDF and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDF vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDF
AVLV

Technology

38.3%
17.2%

Financial Services

13.2%
16.3%

Industrials

8.9%
15.4%

Healthcare

8.3%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
14.1%

Communication Services

6.8%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
7.7%

Real Estate

5.4%
0.1%

Utilities

2.1%
0.3%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.0%

Energy

0.9%
14.4%

Technology

QDF
38.3%
AVLV
17.2%

Financial Services

QDF
13.2%
AVLV
16.3%

Industrials

QDF
8.9%
AVLV
15.4%

Healthcare

QDF
8.3%
AVLV
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QDF
6.9%
AVLV
14.1%

Communication Services

QDF
6.8%
AVLV
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

QDF
5.5%
AVLV
7.7%

Real Estate

QDF
5.4%
AVLV
0.1%

Utilities

QDF
2.1%
AVLV
0.3%

Basic Materials

QDF
1.6%
AVLV
2.0%

Energy

QDF
0.9%
AVLV
14.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDF vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDF
QDF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDF Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDF vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDFAVLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.57

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

6.09

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.37

24.39

-9.01

QDF vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDF and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDFAVLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

3.18

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.86

-0.08

Drawdowns

QDF vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and AVLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDFAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.67%

-19.50%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-6.39%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.01%

-19.50%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-3.93%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.59%

+0.21%

Volatility

QDF vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) is 2.95%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that QDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDFAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

3.12%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

9.04%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

12.29%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

17.35%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

17.35%

+0.04%

QDF vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDF vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.07%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
1.50%1.65%1.93%2.19%2.45%1.90%2.38%3.05%4.29%2.70%3.07%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDF and AVLV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVLV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to QDF (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDF dropped -36.67% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 19.21% for QDF. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QDF has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 19.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDF.

QDF has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.

QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.15% for AVLV.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDF and AVLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer