PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDEF vs. FEUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDEF vs. FEUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QDEF having a 10.48% return and FEUS slightly lower at 10.07%.


QDEF

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.68%
6M
8.64%
YTD
10.48%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
12.14%
ALL TIME*
12.72%

FEUS

1D
0.93%
1M
1.15%
6M
9.80%
YTD
10.07%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.78K$126.62K$122.28K
$546.87K$522.47K$732.31K

QDEF vs. FEUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
10.48%17.43%21.19%17.48%-10.94%10.65%
FEUS
FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund
10.07%14.67%23.10%25.54%-19.10%9.37%

Correlation

The correlation between QDEF and FEUS is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021

0.92

The correlation between QDEF and FEUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDEF vs. FEUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDEF
FEUS

Technology

35.6%
37.8%

Financial Services

11.7%
11.6%

Healthcare

10.5%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
9.7%

Communication Services

5.8%
10.1%

Industrials

5.5%
8.6%

Energy

4.2%
3.2%

Real Estate

3.9%
2.0%

Utilities

3.6%
1.8%

Basic Materials

3.5%
1.8%

Technology

QDEF
35.6%
FEUS
37.8%

Financial Services

QDEF
11.7%
FEUS
11.6%

Healthcare

QDEF
10.5%
FEUS
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

QDEF
7.3%
FEUS
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QDEF
7.3%
FEUS
9.7%

Communication Services

QDEF
5.8%
FEUS
10.1%

Industrials

QDEF
5.5%
FEUS
8.6%

Energy

QDEF
4.2%
FEUS
3.2%

Real Estate

QDEF
3.9%
FEUS
2.0%

Utilities

QDEF
3.6%
FEUS
1.8%

Basic Materials

QDEF
3.5%
FEUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDEF vs. FEUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDEF
QDEF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FEUS
FEUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDEF vs. FEUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDEFFEUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.04

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

8.11

+4.09

QDEF vs. FEUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the FEUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDEF and FEUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDEF vs. FEUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than FEUS's maximum drawdown of -25.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and FEUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDEFFEUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-25.31%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-9.55%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-19.47%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.95%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-6.21%

+2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.40%

-0.73%

Volatility

QDEF vs. FEUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.29%, while FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDEFFEUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

3.38%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

10.05%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

12.80%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

16.91%

-3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

16.91%

-0.77%

QDEF vs. FEUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FEUS's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDEF vs. FEUS - Dividend Comparison

QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than FEUS's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEUS
FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund
0.99%1.06%1.15%1.41%1.48%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
1.58%1.74%1.85%2.21%2.42%1.84%2.50%3.17%7.10%2.70%2.90%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDEF and FEUS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEUS has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs FEUS's -25.31%.

On 3-year performance, QDEF leads with 17.66% vs 17.60% for FEUS. On fees, FEUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 17.66% return vs 17.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.

QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.99% for FEUS.

QDEF is categorized as Quality Factor, while FEUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while FEUS tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.09% for FEUS.

QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDEF and FEUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer