PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDEF vs. DLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDEF vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than DLN's 9.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDEF having a 12.28% annualized return and DLN not far ahead at 12.86%.


QDEF

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
6.76%
6M
5.91%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
12.28%

DLN

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.05%
YTD
9.95%
6M
9.49%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
12.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDEF vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
6.76%17.43%21.19%17.48%-10.94%26.04%3.15%24.90%-4.10%17.04%
DLN
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund
9.95%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-5.82%18.22%

Correlation

The correlation between QDEF and DLN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012

0.92

The correlation between QDEF and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDEF vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDEF
DLN

Technology

35.4%
22.8%

Healthcare

11.2%
12.6%

Financial Services

10.9%
17.4%

Communication Services

7.3%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
4.9%

Industrials

6.4%
7.8%

Real Estate

5.3%
3.9%

Energy

3.5%
7.9%

Basic Materials

2.9%
1.0%

Utilities

2.8%
5.5%

Technology

QDEF
35.4%
DLN
22.8%

Healthcare

QDEF
11.2%
DLN
12.6%

Financial Services

QDEF
10.9%
DLN
17.4%

Communication Services

QDEF
7.3%
DLN
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

QDEF
7.2%
DLN
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QDEF
7.2%
DLN
4.9%

Industrials

QDEF
6.4%
DLN
7.8%

Real Estate

QDEF
5.3%
DLN
3.9%

Energy

QDEF
3.5%
DLN
7.9%

Basic Materials

QDEF
2.9%
DLN
1.0%

Utilities

QDEF
2.8%
DLN
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDEF vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDEF
QDEF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDEF vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDEFDLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.53

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.62

14.80

-2.18

QDEF vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDEF and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDEF vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and DLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDEFDLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-57.84%

+22.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-6.10%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-13.71%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-16.26%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.74%

-35.82%

+0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-1.12%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-7.50%

+4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.45%

+0.19%

Volatility

QDEF vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.78%. This indicates that QDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDEFDLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.78%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

7.00%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.83%

9.03%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

13.27%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

16.14%

+0.02%

QDEF vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDEF vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLN
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund
1.79%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
1.63%1.74%1.85%2.21%2.42%1.84%2.50%3.17%7.10%2.70%2.90%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDEF and DLN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDEF has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to DLN (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs DLN's -57.84%.

On 10-year performance, DLN leads with 12.86% vs 12.28% for QDEF. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.63% for QDEF.

QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.28% for DLN.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDEF and DLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer