PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SP500TR vs. TMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SP500TR vs. TMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SP500TR achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly higher than TMO's -18.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SP500TR has outperformed TMO with an annualized return of 15.64%, while TMO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.76% annualized return.


^SP500TR

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.22%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
15.64%

TMO

1D
1.15%
1M
4.81%
YTD
-18.84%
6M
-18.91%
1Y
17.70%
3Y*
-3.31%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^SP500TR vs. TMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SP500TR
S&P 500 Total Return
8.22%17.88%25.02%26.29%-18.11%28.71%18.40%31.49%-4.38%21.83%
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
-18.84%11.78%-1.72%-3.36%-17.29%43.54%43.72%45.55%18.21%35.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ^SP500TR and TMO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1988

0.50

The correlation between ^SP500TR and TMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SP500TR vs. TMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SP500TR
^SP500TR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TMO
TMO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SP500TR vs. TMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^SP500TRTMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.13

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

0.57

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

1.18

+10.86

^SP500TR vs. TMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the TMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SP500TR and TMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^SP500TR vs. TMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SP500TR drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum TMO drawdown of -71.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SP500TR and TMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^SP500TRTMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-71.16%

+15.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-31.38%

+22.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-37.28%

+18.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-40.95%

+16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

-40.95%

+7.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-28.73%

+25.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-18.11%

+9.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

14.99%

-13.02%

Volatility

^SP500TR vs. TMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) is 4.90%, while Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that ^SP500TR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^SP500TRTMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

10.57%

-5.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

22.35%

-12.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

31.21%

-18.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

27.18%

-10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

26.36%

-8.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


^SP500TR and TMO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMO has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to ^SP500TR (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^SP500TR dropped -55.25% vs TMO's -71.16%.

^SP500TR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^SP500TR and TMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer