QCON vs. FLTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. QCON is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. QCON charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.

Performance

QCON vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: 6.10%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: 3.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCON vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	1.33%

Return for Risk

QCON vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCON vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCON	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.53	—

Drawdowns

QCON vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCON drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCON and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCON	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-17.84%	+17.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.04%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-0.67%	+0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QCON	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	0.79%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	2.13%	-2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	5.00%	-5.00%

QCON vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCON has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCON vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.73%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QCON or FLTR?

On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCON or FLTR?

FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCON or FLTR?

FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between QCON and FLTR?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QCON and 0.14% for FLTR.