QCMU vs. XDSQ

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

QCMU (Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past year, QCMU returned -9.68% vs 13.14% for XDSQ. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCMU charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

QCMU vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCMU achieves a -21.89% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 3.24% return.

QCMU

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -37.56%
• 6M: -9.03%
• YTD: -21.89%
• 1Y: -9.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDSQ

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.54%
• YTD: 3.24%
• 1Y: 13.14%
• 3Y*: 13.82%
• 5Y*: 9.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCMU vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QCMU Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares	-21.89%	11.21%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	3.24%	11.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QCMU and XDSQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.48

QCMU vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QCMU	XDSQ
Technology	100.0%	39.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.1%
Financial Services	-	10.9%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

QCMU vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCMU

QCMU Risk / Return Rank: 12
QCMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
QCMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
QCMU Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QCMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
QCMU Martin Ratio Rank: 9

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCMU vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QCMU	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	1.25	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	1.75	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.26	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	1.38	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.30	6.55	-6.86

QCMU vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCMU Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCMU and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QCMU vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCMU drawdown since its inception was -59.48%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMU and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCMU	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.48%	-26.06%	-33.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.48%	-9.60%	-49.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.13%	-1.09%	-56.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.58%	-4.85%	-19.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.83%	2.01%	+29.82%

Volatility

QCMU vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) has a higher volatility of 35.08% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 1.66%. This indicates that QCMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCMU	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.08%	1.66%	+33.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	92.12%	7.93%	+84.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.98%	10.57%	+94.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.32%	15.27%	+87.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.32%	14.94%	+87.38%

QCMU vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCMU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCMU vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

QCMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
QCMU Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares	3.20%	1.57%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCMU and XDSQ in my portfolio?

QCMU and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QCMU or XDSQ?

QCMU has higher volatility (35.08%) compared to XDSQ (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCMU dropped -59.48% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

Which ETF is better, QCMU or XDSQ?

On 1-year performance, XDSQ leads with 13.14% vs -9.68% for QCMU. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QCMU or XDSQ?

Over the 1-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 13.14% return vs -9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCMU or XDSQ?

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QCMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCMU or XDSQ?

QCMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

What is the main difference between QCMU and XDSQ?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QCMU and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.