QCMU vs. BLSG
QCMU (Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares) and BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QCMU is passively managed, while BLSG is actively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QCMU charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BLSG.
Performance
QCMU vs. BLSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCMU achieves a -42.97% return, which is significantly higher than BLSG's -78.12% return.
QCMU
- 1D
- -5.04%
- 1M
- -31.69%
- 6M
- -26.01%
- YTD
- -42.97%
- 1Y
- -29.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -33.95%
BLSG
- 1D
- -5.50%
- 1M
- -30.51%
- 6M
- -63.75%
- YTD
- -78.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $301.29K | $222.55K | $310.26K | |
| $2.68M | $2.97M | $12.33M |
QCMU vs. BLSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCMU Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares | -42.97% | -1.23% |
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -78.12% | -58.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCMU and BLSG is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCMU vs. BLSG — Risk / Return Rank
QCMU
BLSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QCMU vs. BLSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCMU | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCMU vs. BLSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCMU drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, smaller than the maximum BLSG drawdown of -91.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMU and BLSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCMU | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -91.34% | +22.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.70% | -91.25% | +22.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -65.68% | +39.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.86% | — | — |
Volatility
QCMU vs. BLSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCMU | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 106.17% | 146.30% | -40.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.91% | 146.30% | -44.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.91% | 146.30% | -44.39% |
QCMU vs. BLSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCMU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BLSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCMU vs. BLSG - Dividend Comparison
QCMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, while BLSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCMU Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares | 4.38% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCMU and BLSG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QCMU.
QCMU has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.00% for BLSG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QCMU and 0.75% for BLSG.
Find the right allocation for QCMU and BLSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer