QCMU vs. LULG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

QCMU (Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCMU charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.

Performance

QCMU vs. LULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCMU achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly higher than LULG's -72.75% return.

QCMU

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: -16.64%
• 6M: -11.11%
• YTD: -4.41%
• 1Y: 3.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LULG

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: -7.34%
• 6M: -71.67%
• YTD: -72.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCMU vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QCMU Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares	-4.41%	-3.95%
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF	-72.75%	55.59%

Correlation

The correlation between QCMU and LULG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

QCMU vs. LULG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCMU

QCMU Risk / Return Rank: 13
QCMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
QCMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
QCMU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
QCMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
QCMU Martin Ratio Rank: 10

LULG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCMU vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QCMU	LULG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.05	—	—

Drawdowns

QCMU vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCMU drawdown since its inception was -59.48%, smaller than the maximum LULG drawdown of -79.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMU and LULG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCMU	LULG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.48%	-79.88%	+20.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.54%	-74.76%	+27.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.01%	-39.50%	+15.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QCMU	LULG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	92.10%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.36%	87.63%	+16.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.58%	87.63%	+14.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.58%	87.63%	+14.95%

QCMU vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCMU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCMU vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison

QCMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QCMU Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares	2.61%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCMU and LULG in my portfolio?

QCMU and LULG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QCMU or LULG?

On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCMU or LULG?

LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QCMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCMU or LULG?

QCMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.

What is the main difference between QCMU and LULG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QCMU and 0.75% for LULG.