QCMD vs. TSLQ
QCMD (Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares) and TSLQ (AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCMD charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TSLQ.
Performance
QCMD vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCMD achieves a -37.78% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's -3.74% return.
QCMD
- 1D
- -5.39%
- 1M
- -32.32%
- YTD
- -37.78%
- 6M
- -38.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLQ
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- -3.74%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- -62.40%
- 3Y*
- -68.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCMD vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | -37.78% | -11.76% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | -3.74% | -60.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCMD and TSLQ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCMD vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank
QCMD
TSLQ
QCMD vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCMD | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.01 | -0.65 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
QCMD vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCMD drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMD and TSLQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCMD | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -98.73% | +43.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -75.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -97.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.28% | -98.57% | +44.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -67.19% | +54.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 59.63% | — |
Volatility
QCMD vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCMD | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 92.69% | -45.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.23% | 94.11% | -46.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.23% | 94.11% | -46.88% |
QCMD vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCMD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLQ's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCMD vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison
QCMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than TSLQ's 10.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | 3.82% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | 10.97% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCMD and TSLQ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QCMD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCMD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.97%, compared with 3.82% for QCMD.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QCMD and 1.15% for TSLQ.
Find the right allocation for QCMD and TSLQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer