PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCLR vs. XLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QCLR vs. XLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QCLR vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
-6.67%11.27%20.27%28.87%-18.87%3.02%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
-5.53%23.08%34.71%52.82%-37.63%-6.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly lower than XLC's -5.53% return.


QCLR

1D
1.60%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-6.67%
6M
-5.64%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
10Y*

XLC

1D
2.69%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
-5.53%
6M
-5.74%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QCLR vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QCLR vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XLC
XLC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLR vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCLRXLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.90

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.56

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.33

5.30

-0.97

QCLR vs. XLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the XLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLR and XLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCLRXLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.90

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.53

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between QCLR and XLC is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QCLR vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison

QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.95%, more than XLC's 1.26% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
15.95%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.26%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%

Drawdowns

QCLR vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and XLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QCLRXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

-46.65%

+24.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

-11.07%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.78%

-7.38%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-10.76%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

3.25%

-0.75%

Volatility

QCLR vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is 3.86%, while Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that QCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QCLRXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

5.12%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

9.76%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

18.30%

-6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

20.77%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

22.37%

-9.76%