PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCLR vs. QB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCLR vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.


QCLR

1D
0.00%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.40%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
11.39%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
10Y*

QB

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCLR vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QCLR and QB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.74

QCLR vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QCLR
QB

Technology

53.8%
49.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
8.6%

Healthcare

4.2%
5.3%

Industrials

2.9%
3.7%

Utilities

1.4%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.3%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

QCLR
53.8%
QB
49.9%

Communication Services

QCLR
15.8%
QB
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QCLR
12.2%
QB
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

QCLR
7.7%
QB
8.6%

Healthcare

QCLR
4.2%
QB
5.3%

Industrials

QCLR
2.9%
QB
3.7%

Utilities

QCLR
1.4%
QB
1.6%

Basic Materials

QCLR
1.1%
QB
1.3%

Energy

QCLR
0.6%
QB
0.6%

Financial Services

QCLR
0.2%
QB
0.2%

Real Estate

QCLR
0.1%
QB
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCLR vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

QB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLR vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCLRQBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.02

QCLR vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCLRQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

3.17

-2.50

Drawdowns

QCLR vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and QB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCLRQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

-1.83%

-19.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-0.30%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-0.34%

-5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

Volatility

QCLR vs. QB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCLRQBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

5.75%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

5.75%

+6.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.42%

5.75%

+6.67%

QCLR vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCLR vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%, more than QB's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QB
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF
0.62%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
14.68%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCLR and QB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.

QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.62% for QB.

QCLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLR and 0.58% for QB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCLR and QB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer