QCLR vs. QB
QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Both are passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCLR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.
Performance
QCLR vs. QB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.
QCLR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCLR vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 1.40% | 7.41% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 10.47% | 5.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCLR and QB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.74 |
QCLR vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QCLR
QB
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QCLR
QB
Communication Services
QCLR
QB
Consumer Cyclical
QCLR
QB
Consumer Defensive
QCLR
QB
Healthcare
QCLR
QB
Industrials
QCLR
QB
Utilities
QCLR
QB
Basic Materials
QCLR
QB
Energy
QCLR
QB
Financial Services
QCLR
QB
Real Estate
QCLR
QB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCLR vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank
QCLR
QB
QCLR vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCLR | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCLR | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 3.17 | -2.50 |
Drawdowns
QCLR vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and QB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCLR | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -1.83% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -0.30% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -0.34% | -5.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | — | — |
Volatility
QCLR vs. QB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCLR | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.82% | 5.75% | +4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 5.75% | +6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 5.75% | +6.67% |
QCLR vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCLR vs. QB - Dividend Comparison
QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%, more than QB's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.62% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 14.68% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCLR and QB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.
QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.62% for QB.
QCLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLR and 0.58% for QB.
Find the right allocation for QCLR and QB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer