QCGRIX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
QCGRIX is an actively managed fund by TIAA-CREF. It was launched on Apr 24, 2015. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
QCGRIX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QCGRIX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3 | -12.96% | 14.41% | 0.00% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -2.49% | 25.52% | -1.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCGRIX achieves a -12.96% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -2.49% return.
QCGRIX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -8.51%
- YTD
- -12.96%
- 6M
- -11.72%
- 1Y
- 14.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCGSX
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 38.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QCGRIX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCGRIX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QCGRIX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
QCGRIX
FCGSX
QCGRIX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCGRIX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 1.66 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 2.34 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.98 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 13.43 | -11.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCGRIX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 1.66 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.88 | -0.90 |
Correlation
The correlation between QCGRIX and FCGSX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QCGRIX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
QCGRIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 10.74% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
QCGRIX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCGRIX drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, smaller than the maximum FCGSX drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGRIX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCGRIX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -38.77% | +14.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.69% | -13.10% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.69% | -6.44% | -10.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -7.05% | +1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 2.91% | +2.11% |
Volatility
QCGRIX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) is 5.79%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that QCGRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QCGRIX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 8.15% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 14.39% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.37% | 24.14% | -3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 23.69% | -2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 23.19% | -1.99% |