PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCFNX vs. BLNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCFNX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCFNX achieves a 18.49% return, which is significantly higher than BLNDX's 17.17% return.


QCFNX

1D
0.69%
1M
6.14%
YTD
18.49%
6M
19.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLNDX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.99%
YTD
17.17%
6M
18.61%
1Y
31.77%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCFNX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QCFNX
AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N
18.49%1.98%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
17.17%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between QCFNX and BLNDX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCFNX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCFNX

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCFNX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QCFNX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCFNXBLNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.91

1.06

+1.85

Drawdowns

QCFNX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCFNX drawdown since its inception was -8.02%, smaller than the maximum BLNDX drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCFNX and BLNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCFNXBLNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-17.69%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.14%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-3.19%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

Volatility

QCFNX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCFNXBLNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

12.72%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.62%

11.66%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

11.75%

+2.87%

QCFNX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCFNX has a 2.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCFNX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

QCFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than BLNDX's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.63%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%
QCFNX
AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N
6.52%7.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCFNX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCFNX and BLNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer