QCAP vs. HQU.TO
QCAP (FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April) and HQU.TO (BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Over the past year, QCAP returned 11.06% vs 79.74% for HQU.TO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
QCAP vs. HQU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QCAP is traded in USD, while HQU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HQU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCAP achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than HQU.TO's 40.12% return.
QCAP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HQU.TO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 20.11%
- YTD
- 40.12%
- 6M
- 37.41%
- 1Y
- 79.74%
- 3Y*
- 45.52%
- 5Y*
- 20.61%
- 10Y*
- 32.41%
QCAP vs. HQU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April | 5.23% | 7.13% | 10.40% |
HQU.TO BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF | 40.12% | 32.84% | 31.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCAP and HQU.TO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between QCAP and HQU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCAP vs. HQU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QCAP
HQU.TO
QCAP vs. HQU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCAP | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.99 | 1.39 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.50 | 3.23 | +10.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 67.84 | 11.74 | +56.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCAP | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17 | 2.51 | +1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.18 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
QCAP vs. HQU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCAP drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum HQU.TO drawdown of -76.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCAP and HQU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCAP | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -76.46% | +67.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.82% | -25.71% | +24.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -43.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -67.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | 0.00% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -33.28% | +32.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.16% | 7.05% | -6.89% |
Volatility
QCAP vs. HQU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) is 0.99%, while BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) has a volatility of 9.47%. This indicates that QCAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HQU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCAP | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 9.47% | -8.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.93% | 25.41% | -23.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69% | 33.14% | -30.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.73% | 47.79% | -39.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.73% | 47.66% | -38.93% |
Dividends
QCAP vs. HQU.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither QCAP nor HQU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QCAP and HQU.TO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Global X.
Find the right allocation for QCAP and HQU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer