QCAP vs. TTWO
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO).
QCAP is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Apr 18, 2024.
Performance
QCAP vs. TTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QCAP vs. TTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April | 1.19% | 7.13% | 10.40% |
TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | -22.86% | 39.09% | 31.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCAP achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than TTWO's -22.86% return.
QCAP
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTWO
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- -22.86%
- 6M
- -23.56%
- 1Y
- -4.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCAP vs. TTWO — Risk / Return Rank
QCAP
TTWO
QCAP vs. TTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCAP | TTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | -0.15 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | -0.00 | +1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.00 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | -0.22 | +1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | -0.61 | +7.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCAP | TTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | -0.15 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.29 | +0.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between QCAP and TTWO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QCAP vs. TTWO - Dividend Comparison
Neither QCAP nor TTWO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
QCAP vs. TTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCAP drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum TTWO drawdown of -80.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCAP and TTWO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCAP | TTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -80.85% | +71.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.13% | -27.68% | +19.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -24.70% | +24.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -27.87% | +27.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 10.12% | -8.86% |
Volatility
QCAP vs. TTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) is 0.70%, while Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that QCAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QCAP | TTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | 7.70% | -7.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.62% | 22.47% | -20.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 30.72% | -19.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.04% | 32.11% | -23.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.04% | 33.98% | -24.94% |