PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCAP vs. TTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QCAP vs. TTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QCAP vs. TTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QCAP
FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April
1.19%7.13%10.40%
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
-22.86%39.09%31.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCAP achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than TTWO's -22.86% return.


QCAP

1D
0.35%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.19%
6M
2.96%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TTWO

1D
2.29%
1M
-6.61%
YTD
-22.86%
6M
-23.56%
1Y
-4.70%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
17.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCAP vs. TTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCAP
QCAP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TTWO
TTWO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCAP vs. TTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCAPTTWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

-0.15

+0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

-0.00

+1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.00

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

-0.22

+1.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.07

-0.61

+7.67

QCAP vs. TTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCAP Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the TTWO Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCAP and TTWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCAPTTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

-0.15

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.29

+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between QCAP and TTWO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QCAP vs. TTWO - Dividend Comparison

Neither QCAP nor TTWO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QCAP vs. TTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCAP drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum TTWO drawdown of -80.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCAP and TTWO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QCAPTTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-80.85%

+71.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-27.68%

+19.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-24.70%

+24.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-27.87%

+27.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

10.12%

-8.86%

Volatility

QCAP vs. TTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) is 0.70%, while Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that QCAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QCAPTTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

7.70%

-7.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

22.47%

-20.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

30.72%

-19.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.04%

32.11%

-23.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.04%

33.98%

-24.94%