HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE).
HQU.TO and LYMZ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HQU.TO is managed by Global X. LYMZ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the EURO STOXX 50 Daily Leverage Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2007.
Performance
HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HQU.TO BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF | -13.35% | 26.77% | 40.01% | 114.00% | -61.73% | 52.20% | 83.84% | 80.24% | -11.03% | 68.57% |
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF | -3.05% | 50.63% | 17.73% | 42.73% | -21.51% | 37.38% | -9.93% | 54.77% | -22.29% | 26.89% |
Different Trading Currencies
HQU.TO is traded in CAD, while LYMZ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYMZ.DE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a -13.35% return, which is significantly lower than LYMZ.DE's -3.05% return. Over the past 10 years, HQU.TO has outperformed LYMZ.DE with an annualized return of 26.83%, while LYMZ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 15.90% annualized return.
HQU.TO
- 1D
- 7.32%
- 1M
- -10.19%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 6M
- -12.59%
- 1Y
- 32.69%
- 3Y*
- 32.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 26.83%
LYMZ.DE
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- -3.05%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 23.92%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
HQU.TO
LYMZ.DE
HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HQU.TO | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.56 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 0.97 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.13 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 0.93 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | 3.20 | +1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HQU.TO | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.56 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.51 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.44 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.32 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between HQU.TO and LYMZ.DE is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither HQU.TO nor LYMZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than LYMZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -60.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and LYMZ.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HQU.TO | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.76% | -84.31% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | -24.56% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.83% | -44.28% | -20.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.83% | -63.87% | -0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.43% | -14.34% | -6.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.79% | -40.46% | -15.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | 6.32% | +1.63% |
Volatility
HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) have volatilities of 13.55% and 13.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HQU.TO | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.55% | 13.17% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.67% | 22.86% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.85% | 36.06% | +8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.92% | 35.02% | +9.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.77% | 35.54% | +9.23% |