PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCAP vs. AAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCAP vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QCAP having a 4.16% return and AAPR slightly lower at 4.10%.


QCAP

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.24%
6M
3.70%
YTD
4.16%
1Y
7.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.82%

AAPR

1D
0.23%
1M
0.25%
6M
3.60%
YTD
4.10%
1Y
8.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$121.00K$98.98K$432.94K
$301.74K$289.61K$395.99K

QCAP vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QCAP and AAPR is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024

0.80

The correlation between QCAP and AAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCAP vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QCAP
QCAP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
QCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QCAP vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCAPAAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.68

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

8.08

-5.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.28

35.77

-19.49

QCAP vs. AAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the AAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCAP and AAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCAP vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCAP drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, which is greater than AAPR's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCAP and AAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCAPAAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-5.99%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.58%

-0.96%

-1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.01%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-0.44%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.22%

+0.26%

Volatility

QCAP vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) has a higher volatility of 2.11% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) at 0.72%. This indicates that QCAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCAPAAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

0.72%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.88%

1.95%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

2.50%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.71%

4.71%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.71%

4.71%

+4.00%

QCAP vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCAP vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither QCAP nor AAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QCAP and AAPR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCAP has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to AAPR (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCAP dropped -9.17% vs AAPR's -5.99%.

On 1-year performance, AAPR leads with 8.09% vs 7.98% for QCAP. On fees, AAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPR has performed better with a 8.09% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCAP.

QCAP and AAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

QCAP is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AAPR is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QCAP and 0.79% for AAPR.

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCAP and AAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer