PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HQU.TO vs. PQAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HQU.TO vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HQU.TO (BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - HQU.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Global X, while PQAP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. Over the past year, HQU.TO returned 82.43% vs 22.69% for PQAP. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HQU.TO vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HQU.TO is traded in CAD, while PQAP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PQAP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a 39.97% return, which is significantly higher than PQAP's 13.20% return.

HQU.TO

1D
1.15%
1M
20.39%
YTD
39.97%
6M
35.61%
1Y
82.43%
3Y*
46.53%
5Y*
23.13%
10Y*
33.18%

PQAP

1D
-0.00%
1M
4.20%
YTD
13.20%
6M
12.26%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQU.TO vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF		39.97%27.41%
PQAP
PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April		13.20%9.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HQU.TO and PQAP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.50

The correlation between HQU.TO and PQAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF

PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

Often compared with HQU.TO:
HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DEHQU.TO vs. IFEDHQU.TO vs. LYY8.DEHQU.TO vs. HXQ.TOHQU.TO vs. QBUFHQU.TO vs. URAHQU.TO vs. BRKW
Often compared with PQAP:
PQAP vs. PMJAPQAP vs. PBQQPQAP vs. BUFIPQAP vs. CPSPPQAP vs. PQJAPQAP vs. QQQAPQAP vs. PMFB

Return for Risk

HQU.TO vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HQU.TO
HQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
PQAP
PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQU.TO vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HQU.TOPQAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

4.05

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

5.78

-2.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.83

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

8.36

-5.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.23

28.14

-16.91

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HQU.TO vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQU.TO and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HQU.TOPQAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

4.05

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

1.43

-1.37

Drawdowns

HQU.TO vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than PQAP's maximum drawdown of -11.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and PQAP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HQU.TOPQAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.76%

-11.37%

-84.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-2.80%

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.00%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.83%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.83%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.30%

-1.26%

-54.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

0.83%

+6.71%

Volatility

HQU.TO vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) at 1.12%. This indicates that HQU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HQU.TOPQAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.26%

1.12%

+8.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.34%

4.11%

+20.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.91%

5.77%

+26.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.90%

11.35%

+33.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.87%

11.35%

+33.52%

Dividends

HQU.TO vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

HQU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

PositionTTM2025
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF		0.00%0.00%
PQAP
PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April		0.02%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

HQU.TO and PQAP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HQU.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PQAP is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Global X and PGIM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HQU.TO and PQAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer