PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBY vs. ACYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBY vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QBY

1D
-1.11%
1M
-2.52%
6M
-30.04%
YTD
-29.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACYS

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.51%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBY vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBY and ACYS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBY vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QBY vs. ACYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBY vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and ACYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBYACYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.93%

-0.63%

-38.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.45%

-0.44%

-36.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.67%

-0.14%

-26.53%

Volatility

QBY vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBYACYSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.75%

3.47%

+27.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.75%

3.47%

+27.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.75%

3.47%

+27.28%

QBY vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBY vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 132.09%, more than ACYS's 0.61% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QBY and ACYS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QBY.

QBY has the higher dividend yield at 132.09%, compared with 0.61% for ACYS.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 0.75% for ACYS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBY and ACYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer