QBY vs. ACYS
QBY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
QBY vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QBY
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- 6M
- -30.04%
- YTD
- -29.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBY vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF | -4.18% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBY and ACYS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBY vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBY vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBY | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.93% | -0.63% | -38.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.45% | -0.44% | -36.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.67% | -0.14% | -26.53% |
Volatility
QBY vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBY | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.75% | 3.47% | +27.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 3.47% | +27.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 3.47% | +27.28% |
QBY vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBY vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 132.09%, more than ACYS's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.61% | 0.00% |
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF | 132.09% | 15.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBY and ACYS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QBY.
QBY has the higher dividend yield at 132.09%, compared with 0.61% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for QBY and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer