PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBUF vs. QQXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBUF vs. QQXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) and First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBUF achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than QQXT's 1.95% return.


QBUF

1D
0.84%
1M
0.01%
6M
2.65%
YTD
3.75%
1Y
9.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.01%

QQXT

1D
0.81%
1M
0.95%
6M
0.82%
YTD
1.95%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
10.10%
ALL TIME*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$840.97K$1.01M$957.50K
$265.60K$403.02K$549.03K

QBUF vs. QQXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBUF and QQXT is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024

0.50

The correlation between QBUF and QQXT shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QBUF vs. QQXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QBUF
QQXT

Technology

60.2%
7.6%

Communication Services

13.3%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
15.4%

Healthcare

3.6%
17.0%

Industrials

2.7%
17.0%

Utilities

1.2%
7.6%

Basic Materials

1.0%
2.0%

Energy

0.5%
3.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.4%

Technology

QBUF
60.2%
QQXT
7.6%

Communication Services

QBUF
13.3%
QQXT
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QBUF
10.9%
QQXT
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

QBUF
6.5%
QQXT
15.4%

Healthcare

QBUF
3.6%
QQXT
17.0%

Industrials

QBUF
2.7%
QQXT
17.0%

Utilities

QBUF
1.2%
QQXT
7.6%

Basic Materials

QBUF
1.0%
QQXT
2.0%

Energy

QBUF
0.5%
QQXT
3.4%

Financial Services

QBUF
0.2%
QQXT
1.8%

Real Estate

QBUF
0.1%
QQXT
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBUF vs. QQXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QBUF
QBUF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
QBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QQXT
QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QBUF vs. QQXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) and First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBUFQQXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.08

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

0.60

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.08

1.30

+9.78

QBUF vs. QQXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBUF Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the QQXT Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBUF and QQXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBUF vs. QQXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBUF drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum QQXT drawdown of -57.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUF and QQXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBUFQQXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-57.45%

+48.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.99%

-7.59%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-2.61%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-8.08%

+7.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

3.52%

-2.66%

Volatility

QBUF vs. QQXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) is 3.33%, while First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that QBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBUFQQXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.95%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

8.68%

-4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.14%

11.18%

-5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.45%

16.34%

-7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.45%

17.48%

-9.03%

QBUF vs. QQXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBUF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQXT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBUF vs. QQXT - Dividend Comparison

QBUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QBUF
Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
1.22%1.20%0.98%1.10%0.92%0.35%0.28%0.35%0.38%0.32%0.31%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBUF and QQXT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQXT has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to QBUF (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBUF dropped -8.84% vs QQXT's -57.45%.

On 1-year performance, QBUF leads with 9.46% vs 4.55% for QQXT. On fees, QQXT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QBUF has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QBUF has performed better with a 9.46% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQXT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBUF.

QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.00% for QBUF.

QBUF tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, while QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBUF and 0.60% for QQXT.

QBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBUF and QQXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer