QBUF vs. QQQM
QBUF (Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds — QBUF tracks the Invesco QQQ Trust while QQQM tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QBUF returned 15.34% vs 38.08% for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QBUF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
QBUF vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBUF achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 2.46% return.
QBUF
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 15.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 38.08%
- 3Y*
- 26.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- —
QBUF vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QBUF Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 2.70% | 11.08% | 5.92% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 2.46% | 20.85% | 6.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBUF and QQQM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QBUF and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBUF vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
QBUF
QQQM
QBUF vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QBUF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 2.26 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | 3.03 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.40 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.55 | 3.48 | +3.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.52 | 13.21 | +11.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBUF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.26 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.70 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
QBUF vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBUF drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUF and QQQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBUF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -35.04% | +26.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -11.96% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.89% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -8.45% | +7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 3.15% | -2.44% |
Volatility
QBUF vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) is 1.58%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that QBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QBUF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 6.80% | -5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.64% | 12.71% | -8.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.24% | 16.99% | -10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.78% | 22.26% | -13.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.78% | 22.25% | -13.47% |
QBUF vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBUF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBUF vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
QBUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBUF Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.49% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |