PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBUF vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBUF vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBUF achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY's 1.82% return.


QBUF

1D
0.43%
1M
3.06%
YTD
2.70%
6M
5.01%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
1.75%
1M
5.31%
YTD
1.82%
6M
5.15%
1Y
31.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBUF vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBUF and QQQY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.84

The correlation between QBUF and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 — a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBUF vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBUF
QBUF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBUF vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBUFQQQYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

2.36

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.51

2.89

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.42

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.55

3.37

+3.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.52

14.23

+10.29

QBUF vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBUF Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBUF and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBUFQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.36

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.85

+0.44

Drawdowns

QBUF vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBUF drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUF and QQQY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QBUFQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-19.05%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-11.14%

+8.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-3.05%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

2.64%

-1.93%

Volatility

QBUF vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) is 1.58%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that QBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QBUFQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

6.59%

-5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.64%

11.15%

-6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.24%

13.78%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.78%

14.75%

-5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.78%

14.75%

-5.97%

QBUF vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBUF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBUF vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

QBUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.21%.


TTM202520242023
QBUF
Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
41.21%45.34%83.34%20.64%