PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTX vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBTX vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -34.37% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.36% return.


QBTX

1D
-16.05%
1M
46.29%
YTD
-34.37%
6M
-37.13%
1Y
-32.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.38%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTX vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBTX and XTJL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTX vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTX
QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTX vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBTXXTJLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

2.12

-2.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

3.14

-1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.46

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

3.07

-3.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.48

17.37

-17.85

QBTX vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTX and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBTXXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

2.12

-2.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.65

-0.02

Drawdowns

QBTX vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTXXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.48%

-23.24%

-72.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.48%

-5.12%

-90.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.84%

0.00%

-84.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.06%

-4.04%

-52.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

67.01%

0.90%

+66.11%

Volatility

QBTX vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a higher volatility of 77.32% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.33%. This indicates that QBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTXXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

77.32%

0.33%

+76.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

149.16%

5.72%

+143.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

214.79%

7.43%

+207.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

241.97%

15.22%

+226.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

241.97%

15.22%

+226.75%

QBTX vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBTX vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.11%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


QBTX and XTJL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBTX has higher volatility (77.32%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTX dropped -95.48% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 15.64% vs -32.21% for QBTX. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 15.64% return vs -32.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 20.11%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QBTX and 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTX and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer