QBTX vs. RGTU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

QBTX vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -34.37% return, which is significantly lower than RGTU's -26.71% return.

QBTX

• 1D: -16.05%
• 1M: 46.29%
• YTD: -34.37%
• 6M: -37.13%
• 1Y: -32.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RGTU

• 1D: -20.18%
• 1M: 54.24%
• YTD: -26.71%
• 6M: -51.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTX vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	-34.37%	50.44%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-26.71%	80.81%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTX and RGTU is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.89

Return for Risk

QBTX vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTX

QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 14
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTX vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QBTX	RGTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBTX	RGTU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.16	+0.46

Drawdowns

QBTX vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, roughly equal to the maximum RGTU drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and RGTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTX	RGTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.48%	-96.96%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-95.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.84%	-91.80%	+6.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.06%	-62.21%	+6.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	67.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBTX	RGTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	77.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	149.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	214.79%	219.68%	-4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	241.97%	219.68%	+22.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	241.97%	219.68%	+22.29%

QBTX vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QBTX and RGTU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

QBTX vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison

QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.11%, less than RGTU's 28.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	20.11%	13.20%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	28.15%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBTX and RGTU in my portfolio?

QBTX and RGTU have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QBTX or RGTU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBTX or RGTU?

QBTX and RGTU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBTX or RGTU?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.15%, compared with 20.11% for QBTX.