QBTX vs. LITX
QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.
Performance
QBTX vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QBTX
- 1D
- -16.05%
- 1M
- 46.29%
- YTD
- -34.37%
- 6M
- -37.13%
- 1Y
- -32.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- -17.72%
- 1M
- -16.57%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTX vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | -22.33% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 329.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTX and LITX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTX vs. LITX — Risk / Return Rank
QBTX
LITX
QBTX vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QBTX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBTX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 32.10 | -31.47 |
Drawdowns
QBTX vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -51.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.48% | -51.46% | -44.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.84% | -26.10% | -58.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.06% | -14.48% | -41.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.01% | — | — |
Volatility
QBTX vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 77.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 149.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 214.79% | 200.05% | +14.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 241.97% | 200.05% | +41.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 241.97% | 200.05% | +41.92% |
QBTX vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBTX vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.11%, while LITX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | 20.11% | 13.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTX and LITX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QBTX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QBTX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 20.11%, compared with 0.00% for LITX.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QBTX and 1.49% for LITX.
Find the right allocation for QBTX and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer