PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LITX vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LITX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LITX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


LITX

1D
14.03%
1M
-14.23%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTAP

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.09%
YTD
1.26%
6M
3.74%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LITX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LITX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LITX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITX

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LITX vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LITXQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

205.09

0.62

+204.47

Correlation

The correlation between LITX and QTAP is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LITX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither LITX nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LITX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITX drawdown since its inception was -51.46%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITX and QTAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LITXQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.46%

-29.44%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.67%

-0.51%

-30.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.30%

-5.21%

-10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

Volatility

LITX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LITXQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

206.61%

16.31%

+190.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

206.61%

19.02%

+187.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

206.61%

19.02%

+187.59%