PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTX vs. DLLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBTX vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -78.05% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 589.77% return.


QBTX

1D
-14.89%
1M
-53.04%
6M
-81.47%
YTD
-78.05%
1Y
-72.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DLLL

1D
-10.21%
1M
-10.70%
6M
667.04%
YTD
589.77%
1Y
540.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTX vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
-78.05%339.28%
DLLL
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
589.77%52.14%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTX and DLLL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTX vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTX
QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

DLLL
DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTX vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBTXDLLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.46

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

9.53

-10.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

19.00

-20.00

QBTX vs. DLLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the DLLL Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTX and DLLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBTX vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than DLLL's maximum drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and DLLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTXDLLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.48%

-68.58%

-26.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.48%

-57.19%

-38.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.93%

-34.75%

-60.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.11%

-25.70%

-33.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

72.94%

28.64%

+44.30%

Volatility

QBTX vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) have volatilities of 44.01% and 43.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTXDLLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.01%

43.56%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

145.15%

110.12%

+35.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

218.35%

136.53%

+81.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

237.52%

131.16%

+106.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

237.52%

131.16%

+106.36%

QBTX vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBTX vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison

QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.12%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
DLLL
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
60.12%13.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBTX and DLLL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBTX has higher volatility (44.01%) compared to DLLL (43.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTX dropped -95.48% vs DLLL's -68.58%.

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 540.38% vs -72.96% for QBTX. On fees, QBTX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, DLLL has been the lower-risk option at 43.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 540.38% return vs -72.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QBTX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 60.12%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QBTX and 1.50% for DLLL.

DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTX and DLLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer