QBTX vs. APPX
QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) and APPX (Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Over the past year, QBTX returned -32.21% vs 6.06% for APPX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
QBTX vs. APPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -34.37% return, which is significantly higher than APPX's -51.66% return.
QBTX
- 1D
- -16.05%
- 1M
- 46.29%
- YTD
- -34.37%
- 6M
- -37.13%
- 1Y
- -32.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APPX
- 1D
- -11.50%
- 1M
- 36.86%
- YTD
- -51.66%
- 6M
- -50.93%
- 1Y
- 6.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTX vs. APPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | -34.37% | 318.19% |
APPX Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF | -51.66% | 329.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTX and APPX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTX vs. APPX — Risk / Return Rank
QBTX
APPX
QBTX vs. APPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QBTX | APPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | 0.04 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.09 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.07 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 0.12 | -0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBTX | APPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 0.04 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.67 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
QBTX vs. APPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than APPX's maximum drawdown of -82.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and APPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTX | APPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.48% | -82.40% | -13.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.48% | -82.40% | -13.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.84% | -62.42% | -22.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.06% | -37.22% | -18.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.01% | 48.66% | +18.35% |
Volatility
QBTX vs. APPX - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a higher volatility of 77.32% compared to Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) at 41.38%. This indicates that QBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTX | APPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 77.32% | 41.38% | +35.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 149.16% | 122.02% | +27.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 214.79% | 141.00% | +73.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 241.97% | 140.63% | +101.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 241.97% | 140.63% | +101.34% |
QBTX vs. APPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QBTX and APPX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
QBTX vs. APPX - Dividend Comparison
QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.11%, more than APPX's 19.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
APPX Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF | 19.41% | 9.38% |
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | 20.11% | 13.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTX and APPX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTX has higher volatility (77.32%) compared to APPX (41.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTX dropped -95.48% vs APPX's -82.40%.
On 1-year performance, APPX leads with 6.06% vs -32.21% for QBTX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, APPX has been the lower-risk option at 41.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, APPX has performed better with a 6.06% return vs -32.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QBTX and APPX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 20.11%, compared with 19.41% for APPX.
APPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBTX and APPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer