QBTS vs. SMR
QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) and SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) are both stocks. QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while SMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, QBTS returned 123.62%/yr vs 5.43%/yr for SMR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QBTS vs. SMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTS achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -30.20% return.
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 47.17%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMR
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -17.31%
- YTD
- -30.20%
- 6M
- -46.07%
- 1Y
- -75.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
QBTS vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -30.20% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | -29.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTS and SMR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, QBTS and SMR have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
QBTS:
$8.59B
SMR:
$3.16B
QBTS:
-$1.08
SMR:
-$2.02
QBTS:
637.12
SMR:
104.42
QBTS:
7.64
SMR:
2.71
QBTS:
$12.44M
SMR:
$18.10M
QBTS:
$8.25M
SMR:
$4.45M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
SMR:
-$696.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTS vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank
QBTS
SMR
QBTS vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTS | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.87 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | -0.91 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | -1.32 | +2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTS vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than SMR's maximum drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and SMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTS | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.67% | -87.47% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.01% | -82.86% | +11.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.17% | -82.86% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -87.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.81% | -81.49% | +33.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.66% | -35.08% | -30.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.64% | 57.39% | -16.75% |
Volatility
QBTS vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison
D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a higher volatility of 42.66% compared to NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) at 28.93%. This indicates that QBTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTS | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.66% | 28.93% | +13.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.89% | 69.57% | +7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.46% | 102.59% | +5.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.99% | 93.50% | +57.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.99% | 89.31% | +61.68% |
Dividends
QBTS vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison
Neither QBTS nor SMR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QBTS vs. SMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between D-Wave Quantum Inc and NuScale Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTS and SMR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to SMR (28.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTS dropped -96.67% vs SMR's -87.47%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBTS and SMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer