QBTS vs. PULS
QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) is a stock, while PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. Over the past 3 years, QBTS returned 123.62%/yr vs 5.59%/yr for PULS. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QBTS vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTS achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 1.88% return.
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 14.84%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 54.05%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PULS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- —
QBTS vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.88% | 4.97% | 6.12% | 6.26% | 1.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTS and PULS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTS vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank
QBTS
PULS
QBTS vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTS | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -31.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 7.59 | -6.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 52.47 | -51.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 317.38 | -316.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTS vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and PULS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTS | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.67% | -5.85% | -90.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.01% | -0.09% | -70.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.17% | -0.34% | -78.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.81% | 0.00% | -47.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.66% | -0.09% | -65.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.64% | 0.01% | +40.63% |
Volatility
QBTS vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a higher volatility of 42.66% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.11%. This indicates that QBTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTS | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.66% | 0.11% | +42.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.89% | 0.30% | +76.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.46% | 0.41% | +108.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.99% | 0.70% | +150.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.99% | 1.33% | +149.66% |
Dividends
QBTS vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
QBTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTS and PULS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to PULS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTS dropped -96.67% vs PULS's -5.85%.
PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.41 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBTS and PULS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer