PULS vs. STOT
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and SPDR DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT).
PULS and STOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PULS is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018. STOT is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 13, 2016.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PULS or STOT.
Performance
PULS vs. STOT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PULS achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than STOT's 4.68% return.
PULS
5.47%
0.39%
2.89%
6.35%
3.10%
N/A
STOT
4.68%
0.26%
3.21%
6.26%
1.96%
N/A
Key characteristics
| PULS | STOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 12.22 | 4.27 |
| Sortino Ratio | 30.20 | 6.92 |
| Omega Ratio | 7.88 | 2.01 |
| Calmar Ratio | 63.77 | 8.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 393.30 | 32.62 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.02% | 0.19% |
| Daily Std Dev | 0.53% | 1.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.85% | -6.07% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PULS vs. STOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PULS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than STOT's 0.45% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between PULS and STOT is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PULS vs. STOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and SPDR DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PULS vs. STOT - Dividend Comparison
PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, more than STOT's 5.07% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 5.69% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.92% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STOT SPDR DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 5.07% | 4.53% | 2.53% | 1.77% | 1.66% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 1.95% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
PULS vs. STOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PULS drawdown since its inception was -5.85%, roughly equal to the maximum STOT drawdown of -6.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULS and STOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PULS vs. STOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) is 0.12%, while SPDR DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) has a volatility of 0.44%. This indicates that PULS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.