QBTS vs. DNN

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) and DNN (Denison Mines Corp) are both stocks. QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while DNN operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 3 years, QBTS returned 123.62%/yr vs 36.24%/yr for DNN. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QBTS vs. DNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTS achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly lower than DNN's 15.04% return.

QBTS

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: 9.00%
• YTD: -10.63%
• 6M: -10.46%
• 1Y: 47.17%
• 3Y*: 123.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DNN

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -14.76%
• YTD: 15.04%
• 6M: 17.24%
• 1Y: 88.89%
• 3Y*: 36.24%
• 5Y*: 16.76%
• 10Y*: 18.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTS vs. DNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	-10.63%	211.31%	854.44%	-38.88%	-83.96%
DNN Denison Mines Corp	15.04%	47.78%	1.69%	53.91%	-0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTS and DNN is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022	0.26

Over the past year, QBTS and DNN have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap QBTS : $8.59B DNN : $2.76B
EPS QBTS : -$1.08 DNN : -CA$0.28
PS Ratio QBTS : 637.12 DNN : 888.52
PB Ratio QBTS : 7.64 DNN : 14.81
Total Revenue (TTM) QBTS : $12.44M DNN : CA$4.34M
Gross Profit (TTM) QBTS : $8.25M DNN : -CA$12.87M
EBITDA (TTM) QBTS : -$399.03M DNN : -CA$155.36M

Return for Risk

QBTS vs. DNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 60
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 55

DNN

DNN Risk / Return Rank: 80
DNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
DNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DNN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
DNN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTS vs. DNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBTS	DNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	1.46	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.09	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.25	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	2.54	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.16	6.49	-5.33

QBTS vs. DNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTS Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the DNN Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTS and DNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QBTS vs. DNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, roughly equal to the maximum DNN drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and DNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTS	DNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.67%	-98.96%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.01%	-35.24%	-35.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.17%	-52.48%	-26.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.81%	-84.13%	+36.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.66%	-85.05%	+19.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.64%	13.74%	+26.90%

Volatility

QBTS vs. DNN - Volatility Comparison

D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a higher volatility of 42.66% compared to Denison Mines Corp (DNN) at 19.82%. This indicates that QBTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBTS	DNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	42.66%	19.82%	+22.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.89%	46.75%	+30.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	108.46%	61.29%	+47.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	150.99%	63.48%	+87.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	150.99%	64.30%	+86.69%

Dividends

QBTS vs. DNN - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBTS nor DNN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBTS and DNN in my portfolio?

QBTS and DNN have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBTS or DNN?

QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to DNN (19.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTS dropped -96.67% vs DNN's -98.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DNN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.